Uni-Logo
Sie sind hier: Startseite Projects Medical statistics Current Projects Reviews
Artikelaktionen

Reviews

Evaluation of bias in systematic reviews

Principal investigator

Dr. Guido Schwarzer
Institute for Medical Biometry and Medical Informatics
University Hospital Freiburg
Stefan-Meier-Str. 26, 79104 Freiburg, Germany
Phone: ++49 (0)761 203 6668
Fax: ++49 (0)761 203 6680

Researchers

Dr. Guido Schwarzer sc@imbi.uni-freiburg.de ++49 (0)761 203 6668
Dr. James Carpenter jrc@imbi.uni-freiburg.de
Dipl. Math. Gerta Rücker ruecker@imbi.uni-freiburg.de ++49 (0)761 203 6673

Summary

The overarching project aim was to review, evaluate and develop `modern statistical methods for the detection, quantification and correction of bias in the results of systematic reviews', taking the Copas model for publication bias as a starting point.
A suite of R functions to fit the Copas model, then tabulate and graph the results, has been developed and made available as part of the meta package. We utilised this R package to evaluate the practical utility of the Copas model both by simulation and by analysing 160 meta-analyses with binary outcomes.
We have proposed a new model for publication bias which we believe is more accessible to Cochrane reviewers than the Copas model. Further, we have proposed a rapid, approximate method for fitting this model, which utilises an approach developed by one of us for sensitivity analysis after multiple imputation. Furthermore, we have proposed a new test for detecting publication bias, and evaluated this and all existing tests using a comprehensive simulation study. This evaluation showed our new test is one of the most accurate and powerful.
Finally, we have undertaken an empirical study on the relationship between (a) the p-value of the primary hypothesis test reported by a study and (b) the number of citations the study subsequently receives. This showed that, even after adjustment, articles reporting small p-values were cited more frequently.
Our proposal for the next funding period builds directly on this work, and will naturally lead to collaborations with the Non-randomized and Pharmacoepi groups. In particular, the new multiple-imputation based method for publication bias provides a nice framework to approach the problem of selection bias in non-randomized studies. Furthermore, we want to explore whether a meta-analytic approach can be exploited to simplify the analysis of large complex international observational studies.

Publications

  • Schwarzer G, Antes G, Schumacher M: A test for publication bias in meta-analysis with sparse binary data. Statistics in Medicine, 2006; Published online: 5 June 2006; DOI: 10.1002/sim.2588.
  • Galandi D, Schwarzer G, Antes G: The demise of the randomised controlled trial: bibliometric study of the German-language health care literature, 1948 to 2004. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2006; 6:30.
  • Rücker G, Schwarzer G, Carpenter JR: Arcsine test for publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes, 2006. Submitted.
  • Nieminen P, Carpenter JR, Rücker G, Schumacher M: The relationship between quality of research and citation frequency. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 2006; 6:42.
  • Nieminen P, Rücker G, Miettunen J, Carpenter JR, Schumacher M: Statistically significant papers in psychiatry were cited more often than others. Accepted for Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2006.
  • Nieminen P, Miettunen J, Koponen H, Isohanni M: Statistical methodologies in psychopharmacology. A review. Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical & Experimental, 2006; 21:195-203.
  • Bohlius J, Reiser M, Schwarzer G, Engert A: Impact of prophylactic use of granulopoiesis-stimulating factors (G-CSF and GM-CSF) in patients with malignant lymphoma undergoing conventional chemotherapy: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Brit J Haematol, 2003; 122: 413-423.
  • Langensiepen S, Bohlius J, Seidenfeld J, Piper M, Bennett C, Schwarzer G, Engert A. Erythropoietin for patients with malignant disease (Protocol for a Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2003. Update Software, Oxford, 2003.
  • Galandi D, Schwarzer G, Bassler D, Allgaier HP. Ursodeoxycholic acid and/or antibiotics for prevention of biliary stent occlusion (Cochrane Review). In The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2002. Update Software, Oxford, 2002.
  • Dietrich ES, Bieser U, Frank U, Schwarzer G, Daschner FD. Ceftriaxone versus other cephalosporins for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis: A meta-analysis of 43 randomized controlled trials. Chemother, 2002; 48: 49-59.
  • Schwarzer G, Antes G, Schumacher M: Inflation of type I error rate in two statistical tests for the detection of publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes. Stat Med, 2002; 21: 2465-2477.
  • Schwarzer G, Galandi D, Antes G, Schumacher M: Meta-Analysen randomisierter klinischer Studien, Publikations-Bias und Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM). Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie in Medizin und Biologie, 2000; 31: 1-21.
  • Blettner M, Sauerbrei W, Schlehofer B, Scheuchenpflug T, Friedenreich C. Traditional reviews, meta-analyses and pooled analyses in epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol, 1999; 28: 1-9.
  • Egger M, Zellweger-Zahner T, Schneider M, Junker C, Lengeler C, Antes G: Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German. Lancet, 1997; 350: 326-329.
  • « April 2024 »
    April
    MoDiMiDoFrSaSo
    1234567
    891011121314
    15161718192021
    22232425262728
    2930
    Benutzerspezifische Werkzeuge